2024 Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Author: mwuk

August undefined, 2024

WebJan 11, 2016 · EF traditionally had both types of zoom operation. All of the big white RF models so far are extending zooms: RF 70-200/2.8 RF 70-200/4 RF 100-500/4.5-7.1 … WebJun 6, 2024 · The Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens - an optical masterpiece. Neat 6 minutes video by BorrowLenses telling differences between Canon’s RF mount for mirrorless cameras and EF mount for …

Upgrade from 80D to R6 or R7, considering my lenses and uses...

WebThe RP has the same sensor as the 6Dii, which according to DxOMark scores, has about 1.5 stops less DR than the SL2 at ISO 100. That difference decreases to both performing pretty much equally at ISO 400, and at higher ISOs the 6Dii sensor offers an extra stop of DR. So I think the notion that the SL2 "blows the EOS RP out of the water" is a ... WebI currently own the EF 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS II, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L, TS-E 17mm f/4L, and RF 70-200mm f/4L. I'd say that they all seem to have fairly similar build quality and construction materials. I certainly haven't noticed any dramatic differences when out shooting. lynchburg ohio houses for sale

What do you guys think about the Canon RF 100-400mm f/5.6-8 IS ... - reddit

WebNo loss in image quality or autofocus performance, at all, when using a basic EF-to-EF-M or EF-to-RF adapter. All a basic adapter does is push the lens out to be the correct distance from the sensor in order to properly focus the light, and extend the electrical contacts out so that the body can communicate with the lens. WebRF vs EF 24-70 2.8. I just ordered the R6. And now am looking into a buying a 24-70 2.8. I’m in debate with myself about the following choice. The RF 24-70 or the EF 24-70 ii. The second one is regularly available as second hand and gives room for another second hand lens. But the built quality of je RF is way better. WebWhat’s the quality difference like between the new RF lenses and the old EF lenses? Will clients likely notice the difference? 0 comments 50% Upvoted Log in or sign up to leave a comment Log In Sign Up Sort by: best no comments yet Be the first to share what you think! More posts from the canon community 291 Posted by u/ImaHazardtoSociety lynchburg ohio is in what county

Canon RF vs EF Lenses - Is The New Generation Better?

Switching to Canon.. EF or RF lenses? : r/canon - reddit.com

WebAll three have Image Stabilization, including the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM and Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM, where the corresponding EF lenses do not. "And the third lens in the trinity, the Canon RF 70 … WebEF lenses are designed for Canon's DSLR cameras, while RF lenses are specifically created for Canon's mirrorless cameras. RF lenses have a larger mount diameter, which allows them to transmit more information between the lens and camera body. This means that RF lenses can offer faster autofocus and better image stabilization. kinnaird primary school larbertWebNov 23, 2024 · For this purpose these lenses have been compared: Canon RF 50mm 1.2L. Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L. Canon EF 50mm 1.2L. … lynchburg oncologist

"WebHelp me decide: Fujifilm X-T5 vs Canon EOS R8. after neglecting my beloved hobby in the last few years/unpacking my cameras far too seldom, the fascination grabbed me again. After some market research, I came across camera models that caught my attention: the Fujifilm X-T5 and the EOS R8. I know that these are two very different cameras, and to ... " - Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon RF 100-300mm f/2.8L IS USM next from Canon

WebJan 11, 2016 · The RF 70-200/2.8 is my favourite major-change lens. To me, the size and weight difference over the EF is very real, and well-worth the telescoping action. Probably the RF70-200/4 is a huge improvement in usability too, but I've never shot with it. I like it even better than the RF100-500 vs the EF100-400. ••• WebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome!

Did you know?

WebOptically, the RF50/1.2 and RF85/1.2 L's are worlds better than the EF variants. They are much faster in AF speed and their sharpness when shot wide-open is unreal. Whether that's worth it to you or not, that's up to you to decide, but for someone that values these aspects, it is very much worth it. 19 MintyMarlfox • 3 yr. ago WebThe RP body would run me $899 on canon site refurbished or roughly $600 used on craigslist, etc. Lenses I'm considering for M50 as well as RP if I go that route.... RF. Rokinon 14mm f2.8 $250 NEW (B&H) Canon 50mm f1.8 $200 NEW (Canon) Canon 35mm f1.8 $400 REFURB (Canon) Canon 24-105mm f4 $880 REFURB (Canon) EF-M

WebIt is the spiritual successor of the EF-S 55-250MM F4-5.6 IS STM and the EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS II USM lenses. If you have tried either of those older lenses and liked them, you will probably like the RF 100-400mm. I own the EF-S 55-250mm, and it may be my favourite lens I have ever owned. WebMost Canon EF lenses should work fine or better on the R6. Some exceptions do exist, impacting AF coverage and / or fps. With 3rd party lenses there is a higher risk of the same issues occurring, especially with older ones that can't be updated - some of them use lens ids that Canon used for lenses that don' t perform well on the R series.

WebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Go to canon r/canon • by Appropriate-Year-505. EF 70-200mm F/4 non IS vs EFs 55-250mm IS STM . How significant is the difference? A used 70-200 will be around 500€, the 55-250 can be had for as low as 200€. Are the differences really worth the 300 ... WebR5 user with RF / EF lenses here. EF Compatibilty is great. No loss whatsoever. RF glass is more advanced & optimized for new system, tho. You will notice f/2.8 AND Image Stabilizer in RF lenses where the EF counterpart had either 2.8 OR IS (e.g. EF 16-35 f/2.8 OR f/4 IS, same with 24-70, not valid for 70-200).

WebIt's going to take a long time before Canon will be fully transitioned from EF to RF and because of that, Canon has announced a hand-full of EF-RF mount adapters for using … kinnaird waters early learning centreWebEF 70-200mm f/4 vs RF 70-200mm f/4. I've been looking into getting a 70-200mm type lens for my EOS RP. If money was no object I'd probably go with the RF versions since it seems to have some slight advantages but I found some great deals that made me question whether the EF might be the way to go. The RF F/4 goes for around 1250 euros while I ... lynchburg old city cemeteryWebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. We also sometime talk about other canon equipment such as printers. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome! lynchburg oh mapWebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Mostly EF L lenses at the moment using the adapter. 24-70mm 2.8L II 70-200mm 2.8L II 16-35mm 2.8L III 85mm 1.4L 50mm 1.4 ... [New … lynchburg oncologyWebNov 23, 2024 · Specifically the 24-70mm ($600 more for RF), and the 70-200mm ($800 more). If you have existing EF lenses, I would run with those for now. I have three EF … kinnairds point worton mdWeb4. FantasticGlass • 7 mo. ago. The L series RF glass handles CA and flaring better and is a bit sharper wide open. But compared to the most modern EF glass it's actually pretty close. The biggest difference I noticed was CA, the RF L glass has basically none. It's impressive. kinnally irelandWebThe RF 24-105 f4 is larger and heavier, but optically superior, aside from the constant f4 maximum aperture. It is weather sealed and has both a control and focus ring. The RF 24-105 f4-7.1 is small and light and forms a very small fullframe package combined with the RP. The tradeoffs of the f4-7.1 are: lynchburg online marketplace