WebThe first two requirements have proved less problematical than the third but the fact that they can still give rise to difficulty is well illustrated in the recent decision of Colin Rimmer … WebBy contrast, in Hunter v Moss case, it seems the separation requirement is relaxed for intangible things such as shares. 28. In this case, even though the 50 shares that the …

The determination of valid trusts under the law: a discussion of the ...

Hunter v Moss [1994] 1 WLR 452 is an English trusts law case from the Court of Appeal concerning the certainty of subject matter necessary to form a trust. Moss promised Hunter 50 shares in his company as part of an employment contract, but failed to provide them. Hunter brought a claim against Moss for them, arguing that Moss's promise had created a trust over those 50 shares. The co… Web3 mrt. 2024 · Nevertheless, there have been mixed reactions from critics. It has been positively commented on as ‘fair, sensible and workable.’ But other commentators also argue that intangible assets are not in a different position from tangible. Hudson wrote “the decision in Hunter v Moss is wrong and should not be relied upon\” . tapeworms in dogs and cats

Equity and Trust PDF Trust Law Law And Economics - Scribd

WebHunter v moss criticisms. Words: 1416. Subject: Law. Certainty of subject matter and the critcisms of hunter v moss When creating an express trust knight and knight articulated … Web27 okt. 2024 · Hunter v Moss: CA 21 Dec 1993. The defendant challenged the finding that an oral express trust applied to 50 of his 950 shares on the basis there was not certainty … WebH worked as a finance director of a company called Moss Electrical Ltd. M in an oral conversation with H said 5% of his shares are his as an employee incentive. No shares … tapeworms in cats transmission to humans